Dr. Scott Johnson: [10.27.13] End Time Current Events.

[10.27.13] End Time Current Events.

**PDF - [10.27.13] End Time Current Events**

*Part 1 Table of Contents:

• America: DHS preparing for possible Riots / Martial Law on Nov 1st over Food Stamps–FOX video News Updates
• Fort Hood Soldiers Told That Christians, ProLifers & Tea Partiers are a Radical Terror Threat
• Leaked Video: FEMA Preparing Military Police For Gun Confiscations and Martial Law

*Part 2 Table of Contents:

• Bible Verses Overcoming, Protection, Answering Prayer, Comfort, Faith, Justification & Fear of the Lord
• Bring Out Your Dead! Mobile Mortuary Pandemic Response Mobilization
• H7N9 Jobs; Sudden Hiring For National Animal Health Emergency Response Corps
• DHS to Monopolize VERIZON Phone System During Emergencies
• WOW! CDC Creates New H7N9 Division To CONTROL Local PANDEMIC Response!
• Bring Out Your Dead! Mobile Mortuary Pandemic Response Mobilization
• The Days Ahead-What to Expect and How to Prepare–Proactive Measures In the Event of a Pandemic

*Part 3 Table of Contents:

• Pope Francis Thinks You Are Insane For Taking Your Faith Seriously
• 2007 NBC Report Predicts: All Americans May Receive A Microchip Implant In 2017 Per Obamacare (VIDEOS)
• Listener Question: Is it possible if you could discuss this “you can still get saved if you take the mark of the beast” heresy that’s floating around now?
• Proof RFID Microchip Is In Obama Health Care

*Part 4 Table of Contents:

• Blood Donations are Potential Biohazard from Those Vaccinated with Gardasil
• Girl Severely Damaged by Gardasil recounts Horrifying Medical Ordeal while Doctors call her a Liar
• Are polio vaccines safe?
• The Danger of GMO Vitamins
• Halal Islamic Food and the 1 Corinthians 8 argument analyzed

**Dr. Scott Johnson**
http://www.contendingfortruth.com

Dr. Scott Johnson: [10.13.13] End Time Current Events.

[10.13.13] End Time Current Events.

**PDF - [10.13.13] End Time Current Events**

*Part 1 Table of Contents:

• Claim: Classified Info Revealed- Gov’t Plot On Water/Food Supply

*Part 2 Table of Contents:

• High Ranking Military Officers Fired By Obama, 1st Time In US History; Are These The Ones That Won’t Cooperate With The Impending Martial Law In The US?
• Radio Host Michael Savage Calls For Answers Over Missing Nuke Report
• Obama: Time for Americans to embrace my Dictatorship and their own slavery, or else
• Food stamp recipients panic as federal EBT system crashes; government IT systems rapidly unraveling
• Top bankers warn of dire consequences if USA defaults…
• EBT System Goes Down: Obama Voters Threaten Mass Riots

*Part 3 Table of Contents:

• Shelves in Walmart stores in Springhill and Mansfield, LA were reportedly cleared Saturday night, when the stores allowed purchases on EBT cards even though they were not showing limits
• Obama Ready To “Shutdown” 16 U.S. States
• Companies, consumers running up record debt…  
• Christians and the curse of DEBT
• New Testament Giving Compared to The Old Testament Levitical Tithe

*Part 4 Table of Contents:

• FEMA Prison camps for welfare recipients and 99ers
• American Border Patrol Rep Claims Agents Being Ordered to Stand Down
• Obama: End Shutdown So We Can Pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform
• Property owners in Lake Mead forced to leave their own homes until government shutdown ends
• Obamacare Reality Shock Sets In – Facebook Posts Reveals The True Horrors Of Obamacare
• Obamacare Fines to be Seized From Bank Accounts?
• Door-To-Door Identity Theft Likely Under Obamacare
• Confirmed: Obamacare Breeds Massive Corruption and Fraud
• ARREST WARRANT FOR ObamaCARE NAVIGATOR
• WARNING! Obamacare Health Data To Be Shared With Law Enforcement Agencies
• ‘WARNING: No Explicit or Implicit Expectation of Privacy’ in Obamacare
• Obamacare and the medical destruction of human life

*Part 5 Table of Contents:

• John McAfee predicts hackers will empty Obamacare enrollees’ bank accounts
• Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits
• HEALTH CARE .GOV IS NOTHING MORE THEN NSA DATA COLLECTION CENTER TO CULL THE HERD!
• Kathleen Sebelius is Insane
• 99% of Obamacare applications hit wall …
• 100 “Unintended” Consequences of Obamacare
• Obamacare: Abortion OK, But Your Unborn Child Can Qualify You for Government Health Care
• Obamacare Exchanges Hide Info on Abortion Coverage, Mandatory Abortion Surcharge
• A case for Christians to defund socialized medicine
• Read Before Paying Your Next Hospital Bill: Could Save You Bankruptcy or Thousands of Dollars
• Healthcare coverage Ameriplan
• Healthcare Medishare through Christian Care Ministry

**Dr. Scott Johnson**
http://www.contendingfortruth.com

Report: Obamacare Provision Will Allow 'Forced' Home Inspections by Gov't Agents.

*Source: Examiner




Citing the Heath and Human Services website, a report posted Wednesday at the Freedom Outpost says that under Obamacare, government agents can engage in "home health visits" for those in certain “high-risk” categories.

Those categories include:
• Families where mom is not yet 21;
• Families where someone is a tobacco user;
• Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities, and
• Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.

According to HHS, the visits fall under what is called the "Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program" allegedly designed to “help parents and children,” and could impact millions of Americans.
Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown said that despite what HHS says, the program is not “voluntary."

"The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks," he said. "A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to 'intervention' in 'school readiness' and 'social-emotional developmental indicators.' A farm family may be subject to 'intervention' in order to 'prevent child injuries.' The sky is the limit."

Joshua Cook said that while the administration would claim the program only applies to those on Medicaid, the new law, by its own definition, has no such limitation.

"Intervention," he added, quoting Brown, "may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.”

According to Cook, the program will require collection of a massive amount of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.

One of the areas of emphasis mentioned by HHS is the "development of comprehensive early childhood systems that span the prenatal-through-age-eight continuum."

Last session, Cook added, South Carolina State Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a measure that would make the forced home visitations illegal in his state. The measure passed in the House but died in the Senate.
In 2011, he noted, HHS said $224 million would be allocated to support these home visiting programs.

Dr. Scott Johnson: [9.17.13] End Time Current Events.

[9.17.13] End Time Current Events.

**PDF - [9.17.13] End Time Current Events**

*Part 1 Table of Contents:

• Welcome to Obamacare: Now Hand Over Your Gun
• ‘Talking about NSA would amount to high treason’ – Yahoo CEO
• Get The Government Out of Your Search Engine
• Google knows millions of Wi-Fi password in the world
• New Police Toy Resembling ‘Ray Gun’ Can Disable Threatening Vehicles Via EMP
• Pope Francis assures atheists: You don’t have to believe in God to go to heaven
• CA GOV. BROWN TO SIGN BILL LEGALIZING NON-PHYSICIAN ABORTions
• Abortion Clinics Closing at Record Rate

*Part 2 Table of Contents:

• CDC: Drug-resistant superbugs urgent threat…
• 23,000 killed by superbugs in US each year, CDC says
• Gonorrhea Among Drug-Resisting Germs Sickening Millions…
• WHO Says H7N9 is “Most Lethal”, and it’s now in Taiwan
• Pacific Rim: The CDC Readies MULTIPLE Medical Stations & EMERGENCY Stockpile Supply Deliveries

*Part 3 Table of Contents:

• CDC Contracting With Poison Control Centers and 2-1-1 to Create Public ‘Phone-In’ Bird Flu Triage Centers
• Royal Air Purifiers 
• Large Scale H7N9 Outbreak Being Prepared For!
• Hemorrhagic Bird Flu, Government Preps 512 Million Syringes
• The majority of the following H7N9 information was gleaned from a June-11-2013 public meeting of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee–The vaccine will be laced with ASO3 or MF59 adjuvants–What happens when Squalene is injected into humans?
• The Days Ahead-What to Expect and How to Prepare–Proactive Measures In the Event of a Pandemic–5000 Mild Silver Protein (M.S.P.) Suggested Therapeutic Dosing Guidelines–Plus Further Proactive Measures

**Dr. Scott Johnson**
http://www.contendingfortruth.com

IRS Agents Carrying Shotguns Not A Big Deal?

*Source: WND

Critics were mocked as 'right-wing fear-mongers'

 

The issue of Internal Revenue Service agents carrying weapons may warrant further scrutiny amid the nationwide distrust of the agency for targeting conservative organizations.

The IRS is also the chief enforcer of Obamacare requirements.


In 2010, the Federal Business Opportunities website posted an IRS request for a quote on the price of shotguns for the agency’s Criminal Investigation Division.

The site sought a quote for 60 Remington Model 870 Police 12-gauge pump-action shotguns, the only weapons authorized for IRS duty.

The IRS Criminal Division includes roughly 2,700 special agents who are required to carry a firearm.
According to the basic qualifications for a position as an IRS special agent for the criminal division, “applicants must carry and use a firearm.”

In October 2012, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, released a report charging IRS agents need more thorough firearms training and must better report accidental firings of their guns.

“Special agents not properly trained in the use of firearms could endanger the public, as well as their fellow special agents, and expose the IRS to potential litigation over injuries or damages,” George said at the time.
George said IRS agents accidentally fired their weapons 11 times during fiscal years 2009 through fiscal 2011.

‘Right wing’ fear mongering?
When the IRS publicly sought the 60 shotguns in 2010, the progressive activist group Media Matters for America attacked what it labeled the “right-wing blogosphere” for “baselessly fear monger[ing]” over the IRS weapons issue.

Media Matters blasted the popular Drudge Report for its Feb. 3, 2010, headline “The IRS is buying shotguns!”

American Thinker blogger Ralph Alter said of the IRS weapons request: “It looks like the IRS under the Obama administration is getting serious about improving its ability to collect taxes and enforce the tax codes.”

Radio host Tammy Bruce was also spotlighted by Media Matters after she posted on her blog the IRS request for a quote on weapons and commented: “Nothing warms me up in the morning like the idea that the IRS is preparing a swat team equipped with pump-action shotguns. I guess [Obama] thinks they’re gonna have to start shooting at us to squeeze what we have left out of us?” She concluded: “Give us your money or we’ll shoot!”

Mark Levin gets a visit
Earlier this month, national radio host Mark Levin revealed on his show that he received a visit from armed Treasury Department agents after penning a March 2012 letter complaining the IRS was targeting tea party organizations.

Levin noted the two Treasury officials who visited him were “armed” and carrying weapons by claiming “we’re law enforcement.”

Earlier this month, Josh Margolin of ABC News reported that journalists touring the IRS offices in Cincinnati were “escorted” by an armed federal officer.
“The fact is the trust in the IRS is gone,” Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga, said at a speech yesterday. “The American people have lost trust in this organization and rightfully so.”
With additional research by Joshua Klein.

Are you concerned about the increasing use of firearms by non-military government personnel?

• No, only right-wingers and fringe conspiracy theorists worry about it
• No, I trust the government to do what's right and best
• No, I feel more secure knowing Americans are protected
• No, government has an obligation to keep order. Sometimes guns are needed
• No, if they're investigating money laundering, narcotics and terrorism with other federal agencies, they're very necessary
• No, they are sworn federal agents who put their lives on the line in the performance of their duties every day
• I wouldn't be as concerned if the government weren't - at the very same time - trying to take away MY guns and ammunition
• Yes, our president kills American citizens with drones, and he sets the tone for federal agencies
• Yes, it doesn't make sense. If government officials need protection, they should call law-enforcement authorities
• Yes, it's difficult to imagine a scenario that would require shotgun-wielding IRS, EPA and Department of Education personnel
• Yes, given the behavior of the IRS and DOJ, there's no telling what they'll do next
• Yes, why haven't we broken out the torches and pitchforks yet?
• Yes, the federal government is clearly attempting to monopolize armed force in America
• Other

View Results

Dr. Scott Johnson: [2.10.13] End Time Current Events.[2.10.13] End Time Current Events.

[2.10.13] End Time Current Events.

**PDF: [2.10.13]  End Time Current Events.**

*Part 1 Table of Contents:

• DRONE STRIKES ON AMERICANS ‘LEGAL’
• WHITE HOUSE says Drone Strikes on Americans are ‘ETHICAL,’ ‘WISE’…
• Right on Cue: Christopher Dorner Becomes First Official Human Target For Drones on Domestic Soil
• White House: No more information about drone killings will be released to public
• Charlottesville, Va Becomes First US City To Ban Government Spy Drones
• Cops arrest 10-year-old for bringing toy gun to school…
• Arizona Student Suspended For Having Gun Screen Saver
• DHS Raids Gun Collector – Confiscates Nearly 1,500 Guns – No Charges Filed
• Rev. Jesse Jackson Says Gun Supporters Are Domestic Terrorists
• ACTION:  Contact your U.S. Senators  Ask them to oppose Joe Manchin’s veterans gun ban and national gun registry. 
• The Patriot Pastor Garrett Lear – Concord N.H State House Rally 1-31-13
• Conn Bill Would Require Homeschooler Teens to Get Behavior Assessment!
• Bible Study
• Another Alex Jones Heresy Warning–On Alex Jones website we read: Yet more evidence emerges that our universe is a grand computer simulation

*Part 2 Table of Contents:

• Rockefeller Brother Fund: We’re Buying Off Evangelicals, Mayors, Governors… For The Earth
• ANOTHER STEP TOWARD ROME: “Catholic, Protestant Churches Sign Historic Baptism Agreement” – Recognizing Each Others Baptisms
• Pastor, Please Help Us!
• See Scott Johnson’s Teachings on the 501c3 Corporate Church of America
• Will Christian Leaders Compromise on ObamaCare?

**Dr. Scott Johnson**
http://www.contendingfortruth.com

Imagery 10.10.12

The Whole Truth – Obamacare

*Source: InfoWars

Infowars.com
May 29, 2012

As the fog of the US Presidential election dominates the national news, Obama’s elephant in the front room – Obamacare, has been quietly tucked away in the MSM’s basement. Watch this video produced by American Doctors 4 Truth, as it breaks down the mechanics of government health care rationing, increased big brother control of your medical health, as well as the real costs behind the federal government’s mandatory health program…

Judge Napolitano: “Obama Is Dangerously Close to Totalitarianism”.

*Source: Info Wars

“No president in modern times has questioned their authority.”

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
April 6, 2012

Constitutional expert Judge Andrew Napolitano says he fears that the president is skirting “dangerously close to totalitarianism” with his recent questioning of the authority of the Supreme Court to conduct a review of ObamaCare.

Appearing on Neil Cavuto’s “Your World” show Wednesday, the Judge warned that Obama was systematically flouting the system of checks and balances established by the founding fathers.

“A few months ago he was saying the Congress doesn’t count. The Congress doesn’t mean anything. I am going to rule by decree and by administrative regulation.” Napolitano said.

“Now he’s basically saying the Supreme Court doesn’t count. It doesn’t matter what they think. They can’t review our legislation. That would leave just him as the only branch of government standing.”

“I think he has some problems with understanding the Constitution or accepting limitations on his power.” the Judge added.

During a speech at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, with Vice President Joe Biden in February, Obama said “Whenever Congress refuses to act, Joe and I, we’re going to act,” adding “In the months to come, wherever we have an opportunity, we’re going to take steps on our own to keep this economy moving.”

Earlier this week Obama appeared to challenge the “unelected” Supreme Court not to take an “extraordinary” and “unprecedented” step of overturning his health reform law.

“Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama said.

The president then stated “…for years, what we have heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism, or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law,” he said. “Well, this is a good example, and I’m pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step.”

In essence, Obama appears to be making the case that the Constitution is outdated because it allows for “an unelected group of people” to make judicial decisions.

Judge Napolitano points out that this is an extreme view for anyone to take, let alone a president.

“There are equal branches of the government, but with respect to what the law means and what the Constitution means, the court is superior to the president.” Napolitano noted.

“No president in modern times has questioned their authority.”

“This is an extreme view of the Supreme Court and the Constitution, one that has not been articulated since Andrew Jackson.” The Judge urged.

Watch the video below:

Obama Warns 'Unelected' Supreme Court Against Striking Down Health Law.

*Source: Fox News

President Obama, employing his strongest language to date on the Supreme Court review of the federal health care overhaul, cautioned the court Monday against overturning the law -- while repeatedly saying he's "confident" it will be upheld.

The president spoke at length about the case at a joint press conference with the leaders of Mexico and Canada. The president, adopting what he described as the language of conservatives who fret about judicial activism, questioned how an "unelected group of people" could overturn a law approved by Congress.

"I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," Obama said.

The Supreme Court spent three days hearing arguments last week in four separate challenges to the health care law, which stands as the president's signature domestic policy accomplishment. A central challenge was over the individual mandate -- the requirement that Americans buy health insurance. Critics say the mandate is unconstitutional, and that the federal government cannot force people into the insurance marketplace.

Obama on Monday said that without such a mandate, the law would not have a mechanism to ensure those with preexisting conditions get health care.

"I'm confident that this will be upheld because it should be upheld," Obama said, describing the law as "constitutional."

Republican lawmakers slammed the president for his Supreme Court comments. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, accused the president of misrepresenting the implications of a ruling against the law.

"It must be nice living in a fantasy world where every law you like is constitutional and every Supreme Court decision you don't is 'activist,'" he said in a statement. "Many of us have been arguing for nearly three years that the federal government does not have the power to dictate individuals' purchasing decisions. After a national debate on the subject, more than two-thirds of Americans agree that the Obamacare insurance mandate is unconstitutional."

The president spoke following meetings with Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Until the heath care case remarks, the press conference was focused mostly on economic issues, as well as the war on drugs.

The leaders vowed a new effort to boost North American trade and cut needless regulation that stifles it. "Our three nations are going to sit down together, go through the books and simplify and eliminate more regulations that will make our joint economies stronger," Obama said.

Obama noted trade among the three neighbors now tops $1 trillion a year, and he wants to see that number rise.

But notable by its absence from the post-summit news conference in the Rose Garden was the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada's oil sands in Alberta to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Obama shelved the plan pending further review -- and has endured ferocious GOP attacks ever since, with Republicans calling the move a blow to job creation and U.S. energy needs. He maintains GOP leaders in Congress forced his hand by insisting on a decision before an acceptable pipeline route was found.

Harper has voiced disappointment with Obama's decision. He also visited China in February to explore alternatives. Canada has the world's third-largest oil reserves -- more than 170 billion barrels -- after Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, and daily production of 1.5 million barrels from the oil sands is expected to rise to 3.7 million by 2025.

Top Obama Lawyer Admits 'Obamacare' Is Unconstitutional?

*Source: RT

The top lawyer for the Obama administration stated that the President's groundbreaking health care plan may have been a little over ambitious.

­US Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli during the Supreme Court hearings on the health care reform also known as "Obamacare" has agreed that the president might have made an error mandating all Americans to purchase health insurance.

On Wednesday the two year old law which was an attempt by the Obama administration to overhaul of the US healthcare system was on the chopping block.

Verrilli was slammed by critics for his lousy appearance on Tuesday before the Supreme Court when he practically begged with the justices to keep “Obamacare.”

“Maybe they were right, maybe they weren't, but this is something about which the people of the United States can deliberate and they can vote, and if they think it needs to be changed, they can change it,” Verrilli said referring to the congressmen's decision to pass the law.

According to Verrilli, the court should consider the elected leaders efforts to help millions of uninsured Americans.

“Congress struggled with the issue of how to deal with this profound problem of 40 million people without health care for many years, and it made a judgment, and its judgment is one that is, I think, in conformity with lots of experts thought, was the best complex of options to handle this problem,” Verrilli said.

The hearing which lasted three days put nine Justices in the position to rule on whether the healthcare renovation would survive.

Many critics believe Obama’s groundbreaking plan is in severe jeopardy due to the fact that five of the justices involved in the hearings were opposed the plan from the beginning.

On the last day of the hearing the justices addressed two key issues.

The justices wanted to know whether the law could stand if the core requisite that most Americans must acquire insurance or face a fine is struck down, they also questioned the legitimacy of the growing state-federal Medicaid healthcare program.

The law, which is the latest attempt in 50 years to provide health insurance to the uninsured and slow down soaring medical costs to an already $2.6 trillion US healthcare system, will be simmering in deliberation for three months and a ruling is expected in late June.

Many critics believe that Verrilli cries are an attempt at a political ploy for Obama’s 2012 Presidential campaign and a failed healthcare plan would only arm the Republican party with more mud to sling in political ads.

According to Reuters, 26 of the 50 states called the law in court. The lawyer who represented the case Paul Clement said, “I would respectfully suggest that it’s a very funny conception of liberty that forces somebody to purchase an insurance policy whether they want it or not.”

The mandate which gives Americans until 2014 to obtain healthcare insurance hangs on the balance of the justices who are reviewing the law.